Showing posts with label Blog Against Theocracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blog Against Theocracy. Show all posts

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Blog Against Theocracy 2009


Article VI. Clause 3 of the United States Constitution:
Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Article 11 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States of America and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary, "signed at Tripoli on November 4, 1796 and at Algiers (for a third-party witness) on January 3, 1797, finally receiving ratification from the U.S. Senate on June 7, 1797 and signed by President John Adams on June 10, 1797":
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.


It is a pity that one would even need to point out that the United States was founded as a secular nation, grounded in Enlightenment philosophy. Many of our founders were deists, a category of religion that few evangelicals would consider even "Christian." God is never mentioned in the Constitution and the creator referenced in the Declaration of Independence - yes, the one who created all men equal and endowed them with inalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - bears no "distinguishing marks" of denomination. Notice that salvation and the pursuit of holiness are not mentioned there.

It is vital for the safety and security, not to mention the dignity and peace of mind, of all our citizens that they be allowed freedom of belief and practice.

Laws may be enacted restricting certain practices that impinge on the rights or well being of others (i.e., you may believe I am possessed of a demon but you may NOT beat me to death to expel it, thanks for caring).

The imposition of one religious group's beliefs on other groups is simply not to be tolerated (and should not even be contemplated, but this nation is full of wingnuts). You may believe that same-sex marriage is sinful but you may not deny my right to marriage. You may think that consumption of shellfish is trayf, but you may not deny my right to eat shrimp. You may think an uncovered woman's head is impious, and I defend your right to cover your head, but you may not force my sisters or nieces to cover their heads. You may think - and how could you, you pervert? - that the death of a raped 9-year-old girl is preferable to aborting the rapist's fetus within her, but you will just have to live with your "moral" abhorrence because that girl has a right to her life and body, dammit.

I don't want to see any set of religious beliefs or practices imposed on others. People fled to this continent to get away from that sort of spiritual tyranny. The last thing we need is to move in the direction of a society in which a religion, any religion, is privileged and has coercive influence.

Those who claim this is a Christian nation or was founded on Judaeo-Christian values are simply wrong. They may wish this were the case but it is historically false. Many of them are working very hard to re-write history and convince the masses that their version is true. They are very dangerous. We need to stand up to these falsehoods and to religious bullies who would foist them on us.

I was alive and in elementary school when they changed the Pledge of Allegiance to insert the words "under God." This means I remember when we did not say that and how difficult it was for third-graders to learn a new version. It was not always thus. And even as a child I was aware that this could raise troublesome questions. Which God? Whose God? It is really not a clear-cut statement at all unless you are so blinded by your assumptions that you cannot even imagine other possibilities.

I cherish my opportunities to believe and worship and serve as I feel called to do. I don't want anyone mucking around in my faith or my conscience and I don't want to do that to anyone else.

To those who do wish to muck around in my faith or conscience I would like to say a very clear and unambiguous, "Sod off!"

--Another American for separation of church and state

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Saturday Constitution Blogging

I usually post a few thoughts on the Constitution of the United States on Thursdays. It has become a regular feature, though I have never studied law and am only an ordinary citizen looking at our foundation document. This week was a bit too busy, being Holy Week. Additionally, this weekend is a time dedicated to blogging against theocracy. I am very happy to do so.

Mind you, I am anything but an anti-religious person. I am someone entrusted with preserving, teaching, and celebrating the Christian faith, first as a minister of the Gospel in a Baptist context and now as an Episcopal priest. I take my ordination vows very seriously. I take my faith very seriously. Those who read this blog know all this.

One very important part of my Baptist heritage is a belief in both separation of church and state and "soul freedom." No one may, should, or is allowed to tell anyone what to believe. Baptists were once persecuted and they were determined that no civil government should mess with anyone's belief, ever.

I cherish the right to understand my own beliefs in my own way, without interference. Even within my own faith community I "color outside the lines," but I do so knowing where the lines are supposed to be and why they are there and why they matter and why I sometimes go beyond them. I also know that I do not live in isolation and that all people and all creation is intimately interrelated, so my beliefs, my words, and my actions all affect others. I can be a bit of a rebel and very stubborn, but I am not an individualist or isolationist in the sense of deluding myself into thinking I can do whatever I want. Community matters to me and that, too, is one of the basic parts of my faith.

Just as I cherish the ability to believe and worship as I feel led, so I cherish and desire that for every other person. I do not want my government or any government dictating what religion I must join or practice, nor forbidding me to believe and practice freely. This means I stand by the right of those of any and all faiths and those of none (and those checking "undecided" as well) to believe or not as they feel led.

With the heritage or religious wars far more keenly on their mind than such matters are for us, some centuries later, the founders of the United States sought to avoid the horrors and injustice they had known where religions were established and enforced by law and sword.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Article VI

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
From the Treaty of Tripoli, ratified by the Senate on June 7, 1797 (and therefore part of the supreme law of the land):

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

I am appalled at those who radically distort the history of the United States in order to claim that it was, at its founding or any point thereafter, a "Christian nation." This is arrant nonsense and a wicked lie. It is bruited about for the sack of misleading masses of well-meaning people into first asserting this untruth, then seeking to reinforce it, then to make it a reality. It is an attempt to enforce one set of beliefs on an entire nation and to privilege not merely one religion but, far worse, a narrow subset of that religion. It is a great evil.

We are currently threatened by dominionists and others whose explicit intent is to make the United States subject to their interpretation of God's alleged laws and values, to create a theocracy.

Such falsehoods and such plans are to be opposed at all times and in all places until they are exposed as the evil that they are and lose their appeal. Anything less is to yield our precious form of government and our soul freedom to power-hungry god-mongerers whose desire to impose their will on others is one of the most satanic things I can imagine.

May we keep this nation free, our government secular and grounded in the will of the People for the common good.

--The Rev. Paul E. Strid

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Blog Against Theocracy

I will be joining the BLOG AGAINST THEOCRACY event Easter weekend, standing up for separation of church and state.

Just read about it at Fran's, then zipped over to Tengrain's spot, Mock, Paper, Scissors, and Blue Gal who got this started. Thanks to all of them.

More to come.
--the BB