Showing posts with label Senator Whitehouse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senator Whitehouse. Show all posts

Friday, June 12, 2009

The story line we have been led to believe ... is false in every one of its dimensions


Senator Whitehouse delivered a powerful speech in the Senate on June 9. You may read the full text from The Congressional Record here.

An excerpt:
From open source and released information, here are some of the falsehoods that have been already debunked. I will warn you the record is bad, and the presumption of truth that executive officials and agencies should ordinarily enjoy is now hard to justify. We have been misled about nearly every aspect of this program.
Imagine my surprise. Not.

Dan Froomkin discusses all this here.


--the BB

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Sen. Whitehouse and the DOJ

Looseheadprop, in the ongoing discussion of torture, the Department of Justice, and the White House, shares some highlights of a speech by Senator Whitehouse last Saturday.
I see the torture memo as part of a disquieting pattern at the Office of Legal Counsel. As a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I have had the opportunity to review secret OLC opinions related to the warrantless wiretapping program. Those opinions are also deeply troubling. I was so offended by three legal theories contained in those memos, that I fought to have them declassified and brought to light. Those theories are, as declassified by the Director of National Intelligence:

1) An executive order cannot limit a President. There is no constitutional requirement for a President to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it;
2) The President, exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, can determine whether an action is a lawful exercise of the President’s authority under Article II; and
3) The Department of Justice is bound by the President’s legal determinations.
I would hope y'all can see the problems inherent in this type of unconstitutional and anti-constitutional theorizing.

Read the article here.
--the BB